Several times, Resett has written about the so-called UN Global Compact for Migration. Now the United Nations sharpens their knives and is on the verge of implementing another global treaty; a fresh treaty regarding refugees. The aim is to secure an «even distribution of burdens».
In the text, we read the usual flowery rhetoric,
– The difficult situation of the refugees is a common concern to humanity
– International co-operation is essential to solving these problems
– We must find a predictable way in which to distribute the burdens and the responsibility
– It is all about fundamental principles of international solidarity
Then the assuring thing is mentioned; the treaty is not legally binding.
The treaty has four main objectives,
1: Lessen the pressure upon host countries (probably countries in the localities)
2: Strengthen the possibilities for refugees to cope for themselves (by giving them further rights)
3: Expand the access to third country solutions (i.e., we must receive more refugees)
4: Subsidies in the countries of origin that make return possible (increased international aid?)
The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Refugees has presented the framework to the United Nations’ General Assembly and has gained wide international support. The USA has, however, already made it clear that they will abstain from signing.
The treaty is designed through eighteen months of contributions from «the member states and the United Nations, experts, communities, and refugees» based on thematic discussions and formal consultations.
In his speech to the United Nations’ General Assembly regarding the treaty, Filippo Grandi (the High Commissioner for Refugees) among other things the following,
– To give asylum is an ancient and shared expression of solidarity throughout the history of mankind. It saves lives, builds and rebuilds nations, and preserves our humanity.
– In today’s’ split world we are on the verge of losing our humanity. The politics of our day is ruthless and allows discrimination, racism, and xenophobia.
– We must remember that refugees, provided they are allowed to, are catalysts of humanity, solidarity, and a common purpose. In other words, everything that binds us together and makes us stronger in the face of the global challenges.
– Return must be safe, worthy, and voluntary.
Consequently, it is not the «need for protection» that decides whether refugees are to be returned. It is all left with the refugees and their wishes. What the host countries would think of it is of course no subject to the United Nations’ High Commissioner for Refugees.
Probably, Erna Solberg is already filling the pens with ink and will presumably be among the very first to acclaim. The question, then, is when «enough is enough» to Fremskrittspartiet (the Norwegian Progressive Party). Resett promises to follow the issue closely.
Translated to English by Lars Hoem